Senator John Warner(R-Va), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, illustrating just how much progress has been made in Iraq. And the size of Joe Biden's testicles.
WASHINGTON - President Bush said Tuesday that "it would be a terrible mistake" to pull U.S. forces out of Iraq and that politics should not play any part in a decision about withdrawal…
The war in Iraq and the mounting number of American casualties have contributed to a steep drop in Bush's popularity. His approval rating is at the lowest level of his presidency.
"People don't want me making decisions based on politics," the president said...
The U.S. strategy has been built on an expectation that training a competent Iraqi security force and facilitating the election of a democratic government would stabilize the country and allow a gradual U.S. military exit, possibly starting in 2006.
Which just happens to be an election year! Good thing politics aren't playing a part in any decision about withdrawal! Christ, how does anyone take these jokers seriously?
Rumsfeld ticked off several indicators of progress on the military front, including…
• The Iraqi army has seven division and 31 brigade headquarters in operation, compared with none in July 2004.
• The number of Iraq army battalions "in the fight" has grown to 95, compared to five in August 2004.
On Monday, a U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad said the number was 100, plus 30 battalions of Iraqi Special Police. Pentagon spokesman Maj. Todd Vician said the 100 total includes five Iraqi special forces battalions.
And this is remarkable, as well, when you consider that just two months ago, American General George Casey told Congress that there was a single Iraqi battalion capable of combat without American support:
WASHINGTON - The number of Iraqi battalions capable of combat without U.S. support has dropped from three to one, the top American commander in Iraq told Congress Thursday, prompting Republicans to question whether U.S. troops will be able to withdraw next year.
And now there are ninety five in the fight! Plus five whole batallions of special Iraqi police!
Course, someone might want to keep a tight rein on those special Iraqi police. But back to the Victory Chimp:
"Secondly, we want to win," Bush said. "The whole objective is to achieve victory against the terrorists."
"I'm interested in winning. I want to defeat the terrorists. And I want our troops to come home," the president said. "But I don't want them to come how without having achieved victory. We've got a strategy for victory."
It's about time! We're only three years into this thing. About time somebody came up with some kind of strategy for victory. Want to know what that victory looks like?
Moderate, secular Iraqis bowing to Freedom.
Even as that battle raged on Oct. 27, Mr. Sadr's aides in Baghdad were quietly closing a deal that would signal his official debut as a kingmaker in Iraqi politics, placing his handpicked candidates on the same slate - and on equal footing - with the Shiite governing parties in the December parliamentary elections. The country's rulers had come courting him, and he had forced them to meet his terms.
Wielding violence and political popularity as tools of his authority, Mr. Sadr, the Shiite cleric who has defied the American authorities here since the fall of Saddam Hussein, is cementing his role as one of Iraq's most powerful figures…
Mr. Sadr has made no move to disband his militia, the thousands-strong Mahdi Army. In recent weeks, factions of the militia have brazenly assaulted and abducted Sunni Arabs, rival Shiite groups, journalists and British-led forces in the south, where Mr. Sadr has a zealous following. At least 19 foreign soldiers and security contractors have been killed there since late summer, mostly by roadside bombs planted by Shiite militiamen who use Iranian technology, British officers say. The latest killing took place Nov. 20 in Basra…
Members of the Mahdi Army have also joined the police in large numbers, while retaining their loyalty to Mr. Sadr. Squad cars in Baghdad and southern cities cruise openly with pictures of Mr. Sadr taped to the windows. On Nov. 17, the American Embassy demanded that the Iraqi government prohibit private armies from controlling the Iraqi security forces, after American soldiers had found 169 malnourished prisoners, some of them tortured, in a Baghdad police prison reportedly under the command of a Shiite militia.
Mr. Sadr's oratory is as anti-American and incendiary as it has ever been. A recent article in Al Hawza, a weekly Sadr publication that the Americans tried unsuccessfully to close last year, carried the headline: "Bush Family: Your Nights Will Be Finished." Another article explained that Mr. Sadr was supporting the December elections to rid Iraq of American-backed politicians who "rip off the heads of the underprivileged and scatter the pieces of their children and elderly."
Yes, it's that Sadr. The one American troops battled for weeks in Najaf in August of 2004. I'm sure the dozens of Marines who were killed or wounded in Sadr City or Najaf would be or are just pleased as punch that anti-American Sadr is cementing his role as one of Iraq's most powerful figures.
There is, after all, no more noble sacrifice for an American soldier than to give his or her life for the benefit of someone who hates them and everything they stand for. Or, for that matter, to give his or her life for the man who killed them.
And who were the fighters of Sadr's militia? According to the biggest bullshitters in the history of the United States?
In Baghdad, U.S. forces before dawn struck and
damaged al-Sadr's office in his main stronghold, the sprawling Shiite
neighborhood of Sadr City, residents said.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld discounted the
strength of al-Sadr's militia. "There's nothing like an army," he said.
"You have a small number of terrorists and militias coupled with some
protests." U.S. officials estimate al-Sadr's force at about 3,000
fighters.
Terrorists. That's who the Bush administration told us Americans were battling in Sadr City and Najaf. Terrorists. And Bush is now telling us he doesn't want to bring American troops home without defeating the terrorists, even while the terrorists are cementing their roles as the most important political figures in the new Iraqi "democracy".
Jesus Christ. What a total clusterfuck. No one knows why we went. No one knows why we're there. No one knows who we're fighting. No one knows who or what we're fighting for.
And now the jackasses who brought us this...fiasco are telling us they have a plan for victory and it won't be influenced by politics. Though, that plan most likely will kick in during a midterm election year. When the Chimp In Chief's disapproval ratings have hit a record high.
This "plan for victory" is sure to be so dumb that even this White House is going to have to start recruiting extra idiots just to put it into words. Even this administration probably doesn't have the kind of in house stupid power a plan so bold in its dumbness and cynicism like this requires.
The Poor Man expresses the horror and waste we're about to embrace as "victory" brilliantly:
Politics is a cynical business. Clinton was always criticized (by
the media) for doing whatever the polls dictated, and while people
didn’t exactly love him for it, they sure liked him. Worst President
Ever, of course, makes a great point of not caring about what the polls
say - a posture that polls very well - but Texas isn’t big enough to
hold the focus group-approved prop ranch it would take to overcome the
reality of the situation in Iraq - a reality that has unimpeachable Hero of Democracy and Our Man In Baghdad (Who Isn’t Named Ahmed), Iyad Allawi, proclaiming the US to be a worse human rights abuser than Saddam, and the semi-democratically elected leaders of Iraq telling us to leave and declaring attacks on US soldiers “legitimate”.
So the war is unpopular, the war is destroying our military, the people
we came to liberate hate us, and so, and not a moment too soon, we are
about to declare victory and leave. Yes, it is a cynical flip-flop. (Pity the jingos!)
It’s also the right move, if overdue. Worst President Ever would do
well to do a bit more following, because this whole “leading” thing
isn’t really his strong suit.
But, I've got to say, I still don't think we're going anywhere. There's going to be an aimless and pointless shuffling of American troops. A lot of talk about "restructuring" forces. We'll continue to fight this terrorist today, who tomorrow will be instrumental in achieving a terrorist free, secular Iraqi democracy even if it requires the adoption of Sharia and possibly torture, and martial law. And terrorists.
Who hate America.
And that horseshit will go on throughout 2006, until the midterm elections are over. And then--golly gee--we'll need to increase security forces in Iraq. Just like, a week or two after Bush's "re-election" in November of 2004, we had to level Fallujah.
And then we'll endlessly discuss the neverending progress in Iraq until The Worst President Ever finally leaves office in 2008 and someone with a set of balls and a sense of decency and responsibility finally returns to the White House. And that person will actually have to deal with the collosal waste of money and lives and blood and prestige that the Iraq War clearly is.
Bush will not end this disaster now. He will not do it next year. He will never do it all. He doesn't have the guts or the character or the morality. He will leave it to someone else. And then, when someone smarter and braver and more responsible than him finally makes the hard decisions that this stupid and dishonest war requires, Bush will annoyingly criticize those decisions from his boozy hideaway in Crawford, all the while claiming he is above criticism of people smarter and braver and more responsible than him.
And we'll have to endure idiots like Karen Hughes and Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld endlessly writing editorials in the Wall Street Journal about how Bush was just about to achieve global victory over terrorism when his time in the White House ran out and cowards turned the March of Democracy into a flight from danger!
But, in the end, we'll all know, even the most shameless liars on Pennsylvania Avenue, all we ever did was loan out the United States military, at taxpayer expense, to Exxon Mobile and Halliburton, only they couldn't get the natives on board with the business plan.
In the end, we just paid for the newest, most chaotic Islamic Republic the world has ever seen.
Recent Comments